Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A viral clip from Jack Neal’s podcast reignited the debate about the origins of Bitcoin (BTC) after Professor Jiang argued that game theory suggests the CIA is more likely to be the creator.
The Beijing-based commentator and educator, who has a predictive history channel on YouTube with 2.3 million subscribers, explained that Bitcoin is considered a tool of deep state surveillance. This statement was met with loud and swift criticism from the crypto community.
Did the CIA create Bitcoin?
In the podcast, Jiang asked three questions. He asked who has the technical ability to build Bitcoin, who benefits from it, andWhy was its creator? Anonymous.
When doing a game theory analysis, Jiang said that when all possibilities are considered, it comes down to the American deep state. Until the CIA.
Jiang speculated that the blockchain may be developed by the same institutions that developed technologies such as the Internet and GPS. Later, he argued that the CIA could benefit from this framework.
In his opinion, blockchain can serve… Double purpose: It allows for widespread surveillance and possibly serves as a secret financial mechanism to support off-the-books operations.
Finally he explained that secrecy would be necessary to maintain trust in the system. In his view, if users believe that the blockchain is under the influence or control of a government agency, this could undermine trust and prevent participation.
Follow us on X To get the latest news as it happens
Jiang also questioned where the blockchain servers are physically located, arguing that whoever controls the hardware controls the software, regardless of open source claims.
Jiang said he imagines that if you control the hardware, you can also control the software. It doesn’t matter what they say about open source and all that. He wants to know where the databases are located, and where the servers actually are. He also noted that it is interesting that Bitcoin is designated as a debt.
He also pointed out the Winklevoss twins’ big initial bet on BTC after their settlement with Facebook.
Opponents criticized the question of servants. An analyst explained that Bitcoin works on tens of thousands of…Nodes operated independently Worldwide, with no centralized server infrastructure and no single point of failure.
The analyst stated that Bitcoin is the ultimate test of intelligence and this “professor” has failed. He said that 17 years have passed and they have not understood the basics. Emphasize that sometimes it’s okay to say, “I don’t know,” you know, He added.
Description by Ansel Lindner what you do It is “the opinion of many people of average intelligence.” He argued that such views explain why some gold advocates continue to have difficulty understanding Bitcoin and why others gravitate toward lower-quality centralized currencies.
He indicated that the fundamental problem is a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept of decentralization.
People who have this opinion don’t really understand the open source side or the proof of work side,” added investor writer Lynn Alden. I said that one of the strongest pillars of Bitcoin is that it doesn’t really matter who created it. It can be evaluated on its merits because it is transparent and decentralized.added.
BeInCrypto analyzed Jiang’s previous accusationsand concluded that it was more consistent with a conspiracy narrative rather than an evidence-based narrative about the origins of Bitcoin. To date, there is no public evidence that links the creation of Bitcoin to agencies such as DARPA, the Pentagon, or the CIA.
Questions continue to be raised about the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.This is nothing new. Over the years, many theories have emerged referring to different people.
Published by the New York Times Recently an extensive investigation It suggests that Blockstream CEO Adam Back is the strongest candidate to be the person behind the creation of Bitcoin. Pak rejected the allegations.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel To watch executives and journalists provide expert analysis and expertise
