Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried launched a new public campaign on Platform X that seemed aimed at strengthening his demand for a new trial. However, many of the claims he uses to prove his innocence are contradicted by court records and proven facts.
Published days after the motions for reproduction were presented, the posts hit Bankman-Fried as a victim of politically motivated “legal tussles”, accused of misconduct by prosecutors, judicial bias, and retaliation against the former FTX executive.
However, a review of the claims shows recurring factual errors and logical gaps.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Allegations of gag orders and judicial bias
says Bankman-Fried That Judge Lewis Kaplan and Donald Trump have been “muselized.”
Court records show the comparison is inaccurate. Kaplan presided over Trump’s civil defamation case and imposed limits on the court’s conduct, not a formal order banning public defamation.
In fact, Trump’s criminal secrecy orders were issued by other judges in unrelated cases.
In contrast, Bankman-Fried was placed under a criminal gag order after repeatedly violating the terms of his pretrial release — a standard judicial response.
Sponsored
Sponsored
He refused to repeat the solvency arguments in the process
Bankman-Fried reiterates that FTX “has always been a bust” And that plaintiffs falsely claim that customers’ money was stolen.
This argument was central to his defense at trial and was rejected by the jury who found that the assets of the clients had been ill and misrepresented.
Also, Hikmet Federal courts Consistently, post-collapse asset recoveries do not retroactively prove solvency in the event of abuse.
Sponsored
Misrepresentation of prosecution proceedings
Bankman-Fried also claims that Trump “fired” one of his own prosecutors, former SDNY officer Danielle Sassoon.
Public records show Sassoon resigned after refusing a directive from the Justice Department in an unrelated corruption case. She was not fired, and her departure had no direct connection to the FTX prosecution.
Link the actions of the Ministry of Justice to the policy and regulation of digital currencies
Several posts claim that the Biden administration targeted him because he opposed Gary Gensler, who donated to the Republicans and represented cryptocurrency interests.
Sponsored
Sponsored
While Bankman-Fried was active in Washington, no court filings or rulings supported claims that political donations or regulatory pressure prompted the claim.
The judges decided the case based on documentary evidence, internal letters and witness testimony.
In reality, The FTX founder himself donated directly to Joe Biden’s campaign.
Bankman-Fried also defends About Ryan Salami, former Co-CEO of FTXclaiming he was forced to confess guilt and prevented from presenting exculpatory evidence.
Salami pleaded guilty to campaign finance and money transfer violations and admitted those admissions in court. The record of my sentencing shows no judicial decision proving that the evidence was unlawfully suppressed.
